ID: a8c13 No.11785
I love how Chalo's been trying to sneak this marking onto Sarah's neck like it's just always been there.
Betting they've completely forgotten they already told us who the missing-but-not-really princess/queen/whatever is (and before anyone tries to claim otherwise, pic attached for proof), that's supposed to be some mark of royalty or something, and they're once again writing fans' posts into canon and pretending it was the grand plan all along.
ID: 8b8a6 No.11786
….what mark? I dont see a mark on Sarah's neck or Kate's neck in that picture.
ID: a8c13 No.11787
I'm not pointing one out on Kate, cause there isn't one. On Sarah, look closely at her neck and you'll see part of it. He put it on her a few pages ago in the comic too.
ID: cd449 No.11788
I'd like you to circle this mark, because after lookin' I'm not seeing it.
ID: fdd7d No.11789
There is no mark, they seem to think that the shading under the neck is the magic link
ID: a8c13 No.11790
That's just shading, is it?
Cause it looks to me like part of the mark he put on Sarah's neck a few pages ago.
ID: a8c13 No.11792
Considering the question was about whether it was there in this new pic, no shit I'm going to use this new pic, because I already brought up that it was visible in the comic page.
So yeah, my original point in >>11785
ID: 2224b No.11793
Now you're just reaching for shit to complain about, don't you have a life outside this forum?
ID: a8c13 No.11795
Pointing out BS'ing that's happening right in front of us and predicting that they've forgotten their own story again and opted to use forumite ideas isn't exactly a big reach.
ID: 2224b No.11796
It's also pretty hard to forget when it's constantly being screamed about, it's official, you're drunk Mom, go home.
ID: a8c13 No.11798
That was "screaming", was it? Okay then.
ID: cd449 No.11803
Right well >_> I don't get the point of getting so worked up over something like this, but ty to whomever posted the colored image of the mark. I had not noticed that b4 :)
ID: a8c13 No.11804
If you don't know what the big deal is, you weren't paying attention.
ID: 8f91c No.11805
do you have any images of her without the mark to prove your point that it just showed up?
ID: a8c13 No.11808
Yeah, any time we've seen the back of her neck before. Cause you might recall her hair used to be short before it suddenly grew two feet longer.
Like, are you actually going to pretend it was always there? Are you also going to pretend they didn't already tell us who the princess was if they are taking the "it's Sarah and we totally planned this" route? And hey, if that was always there and it means what I think they want it to mean, the people running that orphanage must've been pretty damn stupid if they went four years without putting together who she is.
ID: 8f91c No.11810
You're making a statement saying it just showed up, right? Logically you would have to prove that it wasn't there before. find an earlier image without it and I'll believe you, but the burden of proof lies with accuser.
ID: 2224b No.11813
That's great, next tell us about the one where contrails and crop dusting are government experiments, after your jug of corn whisky there, of course.
ID: a8c13 No.11815
I was told to provide some evidence. So I did. Fuck off.
ID: c6380 No.11816
This neck mark thing feels like someone trying to make something into a bigger deal than it really is.
ID: cd449 No.11817
I was paying attention just fine. I said I don't get the point of getting so worked up over it. I have bigger issues IRL to worry about. Last I'll say on it tho as you seem pretty intent on poking peeps. I look forward to seeing where this mark leads to in the story regardless :) Cheers o/
ID: 7dfff No.11818
I don't know. There is still enough covered or at a different angle that the mark shown in >>11791
could concievably be covered. I'm not entirely convinced that it just "showed up"
While it may have not always been the plan I think the plan may go far enough back that it doesn't really matter.
ID: a8c13 No.11826
We're literally seeing that part of her neck from the exact same angle in the recent porn pic as the second comic page, and some trace of it would be visible in the first example if it had always been there.
I think you vastly overestimate how far ahead they plan shit in this comic. I'm pretty damn sure that if they had planned it long ago and it indeed means something as big as I suspect, I would think we'd have been given glimpses of it a lot sooner, as opposed to waiting until late 2018.
Also, adding to the whole subject of the fans and potentially the writers yet again forgetting established lore, I actually recall that a page from around the time of Miles and Geecku's sex marathon even has Minos and Ambar indirectly mention the very character that really ANY "x is the absent royal" theory requires us to forget about in order to work.
ID: 7dfff No.11827
I don't know. I guess it doesn't bother me that much.
ID: 1d3b2 No.11830
So does that mean Kate and Sarah are *real* sisters or something? I guess I can kind of see a resemblance.I wouldn't even have guessed that to be some kind of symbol as it's only ever really appeared once.
If that is the case, why isn't Kate the reigning Queen or whatever as we can presume she is older than Sarah?
ID: a8c13 No.11832
They barely resemble each other, first off. Second, there's no such marking on Kate either–if there were, I'm certain it woud've been brought up when Bengala told her who she really is. And shown in some way, especially since she spent almost the entire side comic in nothing but a towel. Third, you do realize Sarah was born a good 500 years after Kate, right? And fourth, refer back to the dialogue I brought up where Minos and Ambar vaguely mention her, Kate's basically been outright avoiding it this whole time. It was also made clear in Crest Diaries that she never wanted that responsibility.
Adding to this, since I realize someone might question why it was brought up at all, my point in bringing up that dialogue before was that the last mention, vague as it may be, of Kate as the missing royal was not that long ago, so they should certainly be able to go back and check that shit. But at this point, I suppose expecting they'd do that is like going outside with no umbrella during a thunderstorm and expecting not to get wet. They never keep notes or check their own archives, they just write whatever and hope people are too distracted by the wall-to-wall fanservice to notice when anything's wrong. That's why the tone jumps around so much, why scenes seem to completely change direction from one page to the next, and why characters' behaviour and personalities are now about as consistent as their tit sizes.
Actually, know what'd be hilarious, now that I think about it? If this mark turned out to be some attempt at a red herring meant to stir up discussion and it turns out they swiped up a different fan theory. After all, fans have also recently theorized that the princess/queen is Rachael or, more ridiculously, Mora, and someone at some point even guessed Geecku. All of which also require you to ignore the established fact that it's Kate. But something tells me that'd be a tad too clever.
ID: a8c13 No.11833
Don't tell anyone? How do you miss something like that?
ID: 2224b No.11834
I can't hear the arguing over Mora's massive sideboob… <3
ID: 13db4 No.11839
That is beyond sideboob. That is rearboob.
ID: 1d3b2 No.11840
>Kate and Sarah barely resemble each other.
Actually pretty similar. Same blonde hair, mostly white cat, Siamese-esque markings (tho Kate has a bit of black while Sarah has brown) pink noses, fluffy tails, yellow sceleras (Kate has brown eyes vs Sarah's blue).
>Kate born 500 years before Sarah
Where was this even stated? With the weird lifespans of Primes and Crests, I wouldn't be surprised.
>Kate doesn't have royal marking.
Maybe because she inherited Crest powers and maybe Crests cant be royalty. Honestly Im not even sure how alot of things work in this comic. Crests are really a foot-note on Las Lindas plot.
ID: a8c13 No.11841
>>11840>Actually pretty similar. Same blonde hair, mostly white cat, Siamese-esque markings (tho Kate has a bit of black while Sarah has brown) pink noses, fluffy tails, yellow sceleras (Kate has brown eyes vs Sarah's blue).
Both being white cats with blonde hair isn't exactly enough, plus their markings are entirely different and a number of characters have big floofy tails. And come on, pointing out they both have pink noses is just kinda reaching.
>Where was this even stated? With the weird lifespans of Primes and Crests, I wouldn't be surprised.
Kate's a Crest. Primes have relatively normal lifespans–only Crests live insanely long lives, and it's because of the special spirits inhabiting them. Kate was born in Sengoku era Japan, Sarah is 18 in a comic taking place in the 2200s. Kate's parents never even came to Earth and are long dead by now, Sarah's are still alive somewhere. You do the math.
>Maybe because she inherited Crest powers and maybe Crests cant be royalty.
Except they obviously can be. Because Kate's the queen who's avoiding her responsibilities.
ID: 2224b No.11842
Hey, a nice view from any angle is never bad. >;3
ID: 1d3b2 No.11851
Where are the sources that her parents never came to earth? Where is the sources that Sarah's parents are alive? Sure in that side-comic someone came to adopt Sarah but we don't know if that was her bio-parents or they are still alive years later. Are you just pulling this out of your ass?
How is it reaching? Other characters have similar-enough designs. Hope and Joy are siblings but neither have the same hair color or eye color.
Shin and Hikari are siblings, not similar markings different hair and eye colors.
Naeri and Shiro are siblings but have different markings.
Toby looks NOTHING like Tila.
ID: a8c13 No.11852
>>11851>Where are the sources that her parents never came to earth?
>Where is the sources that Sarah's parents are alive?
>Sure in that side-comic someone came to adopt Sarah but we don't know if that was her bio-parents or they are still alive years later.
It was literally stated that they're alive, this was even part of what led to Rachael running off with Sarah.
>How is it reaching?
You really need to ask how pointing out pink noses is reaching for similarities?
>Hope and Joy are siblings but neither have the same hair color or eye color. Shin and Hikari are siblings, not similar markings different hair and eye colors. Naeri and Shiro are siblings but have different markings.
All three pairs share a lot more similarities than Sarah and Kate. Who, again, are over 500 years apart in age. Meaning it is literally impossible for them to be siblings, because Kate's parents are long dead by now if they weren't already by the time she was beamed down to Earth.
>Toby looks NOTHING like Tila.
Yeah, that's because, like many things in this comic, they bullshitted that in out of literally nowhere. Also, you just went from trying to prove your point with siblings…to trying to prove your point with an on-the-fly mother-son pair.
ID: a8c13 No.11859
Seriously, I REALLY don't think Randal and Taffy are the type to prioritize a wedding over making sure they and everyone else still have a home. She should know them better than this by now.
ID: 1d3b2 No.11860
This may be the best Mora/Minos page I've ever seen.
ID: 721bb No.11861
Agreed. I genuinely liked this one.